Developments in stiff ground support in deep potash operations at the Vanscoy Mine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a case study of the development of ground support practices at Nutrien’s Vanscoy potash mine, the deepest (>1,100 m) conventional evaporite mine in North America. The majority of the underground excavations at Saskatchewan potash mines are unsupported and rely upon the principle of stress control to manage ground conditions. Adverse ground conditions are typically addressed in three ways: changing mining horizon to avoid disturbed ground, cutting down of bad ground, or installation of ground support. The two former approaches often result in extended interruptions to production whereas installation of ground support allows access to be maintained and production to continue. The timedependant creep properties of the evaporites led to the historical approach of using a soft ground support system to accommodate the large deformations typically seen. The softness of the ground support system at potash operations was typically achieved by utilising point anchored mechanical rockbolts, partial encapsulation of resin rebar bolts, or by introducing a softer element in to a fully encapsulated resin rebar support element, at Vanscoy a wood washer was used. The experience of one of the authors with the improvement of excavation stability following the introduction of stiff resin encapsulated AT rockbolts for secondary ground support at the deep (>1,300 m) Boulby potash mine in the UK led to initial instrumented trials at the Vanscoy Mine. Multipoint magnesonic extensometers were introduced to the mine to provide detailed measurement of back deformation to assess the impact of increasing the ground support stiffness on back behaviour. The magnesonic extensometers comprise of 20 magnetic reference anchors installed over a depth of 7 m allowing precise high resolution measurement of back deformation. The introduction of magnesonic extensometers to monitor the influence of stiffening the ground support system proved invaluable in understanding the mechanism of ground support/rock mass interaction in the immediate stratified back of development and production excavations. The Vanscoy Mine has adopted stiffer ground support practices and continues to explore other ground support technologies in the pursuit of safe optimised ground support practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".