MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981776900 · doi:10.4095/296676

Magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide deposits at convergent margins

2015· report· en· W2981776900 on OpenAlexaff
Graham T. Nixon, Matthew J. Manor, Sarah Jackson-Brown, James S. Scoates, D E Ames

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryMetallurgyMineralogyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide deposits hosted by ultramafic-mafic intrusions in convergent-margin tectonic settings are an increasingly important resource worldwide, yet remain poorly understood and underexplored. A compilation of global mineralized intrusions in subduction-related settings underscores their economic potential and reveals mineralogical differences that may reflect parental magma composition and ore-forming processes. Our geochemical and isotopic investigations of two mineralized ultramafic intrusions in the Cordillera, the orthopyroxene-absent Turnagain Alaskan-type intrusion and the orthopyroxenerich Giant Mascot intrusion, emphasize (1) the importance of wall-rock assimilation in promoting sulphide saturation and formation of an immiscible sulphide liquid; and (2) the ability of narrow conduit systems to channel influxes of new metal-laden magma and serve as traps for the collection of upgraded Ni-Cu-PGE sulphides. Processes fundamental to the production of economic Ni-sulphide deposits in the oxidized and hydrous primitive magmas generated at subduction zones are similar to those that have produced worldclass magmatic nickel deposits in other tectonic settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207