MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981779121 · doi:10.1130/abs/2019am-330823

STRUCTURE CONTROLS ON GOLD DEPOSITS IN THE CARIBOO GOLD MINING DISTRICT, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA

2019· article· en· W2981779121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of America · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPlacer miningGeochemistryClastic rockPlateau (mathematics)PaleozoicSedimentary rockYilgarn CratonCretaceousPyritePaleontologyGeomorphologyCratonTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cariboo gold mining district is located in central British Columbia, Canada. Recorded gold production from the area totals more than 4.0 million ounces, including an estimated 2.7 million ounces from placer mining and 1.3 million ounces from lode mining. The district consists of two dominant metallogenic series of gold deposits: quartz vein and pyrite replacement styles. The quartz vein series includes strike vein, diagonal vein, orthogonal vein, and northerly veins, while the pyrite replacement includes replacement in limestone and that in calcareous clastic rock. The district is situated within the Quesnel Highlands on the eastern edge of the Interior Plateau, which are the remnants of rolling plateau formed initially from bedrocks lain down as the ancient North American Plate moved westwards colliding with offshore seabed and island groups. The district is situated within the Cariboo Gold Belt, part of the Omineca Belt of the Canadian Cordillera, a world-class producer of gold that has had a history of mining dating from the Cariboo Gold Rush in the 1860’s. The district consists of a late Proterozoic and/or Paleozoic sequence of continental shelf and slope deposits developed adjacent to the craton of Ancestral North America, and includes clastic sedimentary rocks along with lesser amounts of volcanic rocks and carbonates. Rocks of the district were subjected to an early period of ductile deformation that resulted in westward directed, asymmetrical folds plunging shallowly to the northwest. During late Cretaceous to early Tertiary time, the area was disrupted by northwest trending dextral strike-slip faults such as the Willow Fault, a major strike-slip fault in the area. The north striking cross faults are an important control for the gold vein mineralization. The district is underlain by a northwest striking, moderately northeast dipping sequence of rocks on the steep, overturned limb of a southwest-verging antiform, which, in turn, is on the northeast flank of the Island Mountain anticlinorium. Stratigraphic position, host rock lithologies, and proximity to north-striking fault zones are important guides to the different styles of gold mineralization recognized in the district. At least three phases of folding and fabric development occur in the district and are responsible for the major regional map patterns. Faults and shear zones developed in the district are of several generations and orientations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of AmericaSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207