Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite de l’anti-syndicalisme patronal et propose une analyse de la jurisprudence issue des cas entendus par les commissions des relations du travail de deux provinces canadiennes, le Quebec et l’Ontario. Plus specifiquement, notre analyse porte sur 145 decisions dans lesquelles il a ete reconnu par les tribunaux competents que les employeurs avaient eu recours a une ou plusieurs strategies anti-syndicales ayant des effets discriminatoires. Nos resultats mettent en evidence la large palette des tactiques utilisees par les employeurs pour combattre la syndicalisation au travail, et ce, lors des differentes etapes de la vie d’un syndicat au sein d’une entreprise. Ils montrent une nette preference pour les strategies les plus agressives, celles qui visent la suppression pure et simple des syndicats. Ils attestent enfin que les pratiques de discrimination syndicale ciblent le plus souvent un seul salarie, mais peuvent aussi parfois viser un groupe, voire l’ensemble des salaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it