Comparative investigation on edible mushrooms<i>Macrolepiota mastoidea</i>,<i>M. rhacodes</i>and<i>M. procera</i>: functional foods with diverse biological activities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was oriented towards the investigation of the biological properties of three wild growing and edible Macrolepiota species (M. mastoidea, M. rhacodes and Macrolepiota procera) from Serbia. The results revealed that the mushrooms have a low caloric value; free sugars such as mannitol and trehalose were identified; oxalic and malic acids were predominant organic acids, while p-hydroxybenzoic and p-coumaric acids were identified as the main phenolic compounds. Also, they were a rich source of polyunsaturated fatty acids, which dominated over monounsaturated and saturated fatty acids. Three isoforms of tocopherols were identified and quantified: α-, β-, and δ-tocopherol. Regarding biological properties, all three species exhibited antioxidant potential, antimicrobial potential and cytotoxic activity within the different tumour cell lines tested. This study indicates that these species are indeed functional foods, due to the fact that they are edible, consumable and hold different pharmacological activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".