MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981866379 · doi:10.4095/222641

The "shale gas" concept in Canada: a preliminary inventory of possibilities

2006· report· en· W2981866379 on OpenAlexaffabout
A P Hamblin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShale gasOil shalePetroleum engineeringGeologyGeochemistryMining engineeringPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The term "Shale Gas" refers to unconventional, continuous-type, self-sourced resources contained in fine grained (ranging from clay to very fine sandstone), organic-rich, low permeability reservoirs in which thermogenic or biogenic methane is stored as free gas in the matrix or fracture porosity, or as adsorbed/dissolved gas on the organics and/or clays. These are self-enclosed petroleum systems, characterized by inefficient "dysfunctional" expulsion and migration, where source, reservoir and trap are all present in the same thick shaly succession. The most prospective shale gas targets will be thick, widespread, gas-saturated, fine grained, organic-rich units with a) significant Type III (terrestrial, gas-prone) organic matter in thermally mature to overmature states, b) significant Type II (marine, oil- and gas-prone) organic matter in a thermally overmature state, and/or c) rich organic matter of any type that is thermally immature and subject to extensive biogenic decomposition. The current economic climate of depleting conventional reserves and rising prices presents an opportunity for the emergence of the shale gas concept in Canada, although significant environmental concerns must be addressed from the beginning. Successful shale gas production has a long history in the USA and each of the four (or more) known play types (Antrim, Ohio/New Albany, Barnett, Lewis) owes its success to different balances of the controlling factors of TOC, thermal maturity, lithology, mineralogy, depth, fracturing, production technique and infrastructure. Entirely new, undescribed, play styles probably still exist. Intensive and detailed, pre-drill, geological study of each potential shale gas play is an inexpensive and efficient method for technical evaluation, to properly assess the economic possibilities, choice of target and recovery of resources. Canada's sedimentary basins collectively provide numerous (perhaps 50) possible shale gas targets, scattered over at least 7 regions. Of these, seven represent regional-scale units with enough geological prospectivity to justify concerted geological study due to the presence of one or more of excellent geological potential, geographic location, proximity to infrastructure, and/or relation to known conventional and unconventional plays. They are: Upper Ordovician of Appalachian Basin, Upper Devonian of Appalachian/Michigan Basin, Upper Devonian of northwestern WCSB, Triassic of northwestern WCSB, Jurassic of western WCSB, Middle to Upper Cretaceous of WCSB Plains, Middle Devonian of Mackenzie Corridor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207