MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981880463 · doi:10.4095/297563

Till and bedrock heavy mineral signatures of the Kiggavik uranium deposits, Nunavut

2016· report· en· W2981880463 on OpenAlexaffabout
S V J Robinson, C W Jefferson, R C Paulen, Daniel Layton‐Matthews, Brian Joy, David Quirt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedrockUraniumGeochemistryGeologyMineralHeavy mineralUranium oreMining engineeringGeomorphologyChemistryProvenanceMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2010, a drift prospecting study was initiated over the Kiggavik uranium (U) deposit under the Geomapping for Energy and Minerals (GEM) Program. The objective of this study was to document the till geochemical and heavy mineral signatures of the Kiggavik U deposit and to identify potential applications of those characteristics in future exploration for drift-covered, basement-hosted, unconformity-related U deposits. The study area is within the zone affected by the migration of the Keewatin Ice Divide of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Mineralized and non-mineralized bedrock and near-surface till samples (n = 71) were collected directly overlying, up-ice, and at various distances (50 m, 100 m, 200 m, 500 m, 1 km, 2 km, 3 km, 5 km, and 10 km) in a fan-shaped pattern down-ice from the deposit with respect to the dominant north-northwest, northwest, and west ice-flow directions. Detailed microscopy and microprobe analysis of ore samples from drill core reaffirmed uraninite and coffinite as the dominant ore minerals at the Kiggavik U deposit, with accessory galena, pyrite and very minor native gold associations. These minerals are predominantly very fine-grained and rarely exceed 100 ?m in diameter, with the exception of rare massive crystalline uraninite. Examination of the sand-size heavy mineral concentrate (HMC) from till yielded no U-rich or directly associated accessory ore minerals, reflecting the overall fine-grained nature and instability of these minerals in oxidizing conditions such as those found in near-surface till. This ultimately limits the utility of these minerals as empirical indicators of U deposits. Native gold grains in till samples collected in this study are, however, more abundant than those in regional background samples. Elevated counts were found up to 3 km down-ice of the Kiggavik Main Zone (KMZ) in a west-northwest direction. The sample containing the highest gold grain count in till was collected directly overlying the KMZ, suggesting local provenance and the applicability of native gold as an indicator mineral for Kiggavik-style unconformity-type U deposits. Moreover, Pb-rich fluorapatite grains (up to 8% PbO), from the alteration zone around the KMZ U deposit, are of particular interest due to their uniqueness, stability under near-surface weathering conditions, and thus their potential to be an indicator mineral for such deposits. However the fluorapatite grains are very finely crystalline, as are the main Ubearing phases observed in ore samples, therefore a new technique to separate, collect, and identify the finer fraction of the HMC needs to be developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207