Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the barriers for implementing learning policy to transform Texaco into a Learning Organization. Design/Methodology: The study has incorporated quantitative approach and distributed 200 questionnaires among the employees of Texaco, out of which 189 questionnaires were received with complete responses. The extent of paradigm shift to take place in Texaco was estimated by conducting personal interviews. Chi-Square and ANOVA test have been applied through SPSS on the dependent and independent variables. Findings: Non-Learning culture (p=0.000), Limited resources (p=0.001), Program Focus (p=0.00) and not discussing the un-discussible (p=0.00) have been found as the main barriers in the way of transformation of Texaco as a learning organization. Research Implications: The implication of this research can help to adopt the positive transformational changes of the company. Practical Implications: The findings can help Texaco to identify the potential barriers and mitigate their influence on their business operations. Social Implication: Positive societal influence can be significant in improving the competitive strategy of Texaco. Originality: The changes in the organizational process can be implemented to improve the learning policy of Texaco.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".