MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981910939 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2019.749

Dynamics and wall collision of inertial particles in a solid–liquid turbulent channel flow

2019· article· en· W2981910939 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsTurbulenceReynolds numberPhysicsAccelerationDragOpen-channel flowLaw of the wallMaterials scienceClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics and wall collision of inertial particles were investigated in non-isotropic turbulence of a horizontal liquid channel flow. The inertial particles were $125~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ glass beads at a volumetric concentration of 0.03 %. The bead-laden flow and the unladen base case had the same volumetric flow rates, with a shear Reynolds number, $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}$ , of the unladen flow equal to 410 based on the half-channel height and friction velocity. Lagrangian measurements of three-dimensional trajectories of both fluid tracers and glass beads were obtained using time-resolved particle tracking velocimetry based on the shake-the-box algorithm of Schanz et al. ( Exp. Fluids , vol. 57, no. 5, 2016, pp. 1–27). The analysis showed that on average the near-wall glass beads decelerate in the streamwise direction, while farther away from the wall, the streamwise acceleration of the glass beads became positive. The ejection motions provided a local maximum streamwise acceleration above the buffer layer by transporting glass beads to high velocity layers and exposing them to a high drag force in the streamwise direction. Conversely, the sweep motion made the maximum contribution to the average streamwise deceleration of glass beads in the near-wall region. The wall-normal acceleration of the beads was positive in the vicinity of the wall, and it became negative farther from the wall. The investigation showed that the glass beads with sweeping motion had the maximum momentum, streamwise deceleration, and wall-normal acceleration among all the beads close to the wall and these values increased with increasing their trajectory angle. The investigation of the beads that collided with the wall showed that those with shallow impact angles (less than $1.5^{\circ }$ ) typically slide along the wall. The sliding beads had a small streamwise momentum exchange of ${\sim}5\,\%$ during these events. The duration of their sliding motion could be as much as five times the inner time scale of the unladen flow. The wall-normal velocity of these beads after sliding was greater than their wall-normal velocity before sliding, and was associated with the rotation induced lift force. Beads with impact angles greater than $1.5^{\circ }$ had shorter interaction times with the wall and smaller streamwise and wall-normal restitution ratios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it