2175. Rapid Detection of Carbapenemase Producing Organisms Directly from Blood Cultures Positive for Gram-Negative Bacilli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) directly from blood cultures (BC) positive for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) may accelerate the appropriate treatment of at-risk patients. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of two commercial assays in the rapid detection of CPOs directly from BC positive for GNB. Methods BC positive for GNB, taken from patients within the Calgary Health Zone over a 3 month period, were tested for the presence of CPOs with βCARBA® and NG-Test® CARBA 5. A subset of sterile BC samples was seeded with multi-drug-resistant (MDR) GNB. BC were incubated using the Bact-Alert™ system. Positive BC from clinical and seeded samples was tested directly with βCARBA and CARBA 5 from BC pellets processed for direct testing using an ammonium chloride lysis and wash method. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals for binomial proportions. Results 65 samples were tested (30 clinical, 35 seeded). Seeded samples included 1 GES, 4 IMP, 6 KPC, 1 co-producing KPC and NDM, 9 OXA, 4 VIM, 5 NDM, and 5 non-CPO carbapenem-resistant organisms. βCARBA had a sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of 100% (88.4% - 100%), 65.7% (47.8–80.9%), 100%, and 71.4% (61.3%–79.8%), respectively. CARBA 5 had a sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of 90.0% (73.5%–97.9%), 100% (90.0%–100%), 92.1% (80.0%–97.2%), and 100%. When excluding GES, which is known not to be detected by CARBA 5, sensitivity and NPV increased to 93.1% (77.2%–99.2%) and 93.1% (78.0%–98.1%), respectively. False negatives for βCARBA occurred with 1 VIM-1 and IMP-14. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the detection of CPOs directly from positive BC can be accurately achieved. βCARBA had excellent sensitivity but suffered from poor specificity. CARBA 5 had good sensitivity and specificity but is unable to detect certain CPOs. Testing positive BC directly using βCARBA and/or CARBA 5 may be useful in rapidly detecting CPOs. Results of direct testing from the CARBA5 assay would quickly identify patients amenable to treatment with avibactam combination compounds. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".