Investigation on the thermal performance of the diaphragm wall in deep buried engineering: a simulation study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ground source heat pump technology is widely used in buildings’ to meet the cooling and heating demand. As a special form of the buried pipe, diaphragm wall has received increasing interests due to high energy-efficiency and relatively low costs. Previous studies investigated the thermal behavior of diaphragm wall in underground tunnels or underground parking while very few studies were carried out on deep-buried engineering with the air-conditioned adjacent indoor environment. In this study, the effects of buried pipes on the heat transfer regulation of the diaphragm wall and the indoor load are analyzed. Simulation results indicated that average energy exchange through the pipe in the diaphragm wall is 78.1% compared with that of the conventional buried pipe for the ground heat pump. The heat exchange capacity of the buried pipe in the diaphragm wall in intermittent mode is 1.2 times of that in the non-intermittent mode in 14h. For the underground engineering boundary with pipes buried in the concrete layer, heat transfer through the inner surface reduced 3.8W/m 2 , which would consequently add to the indoor cooling load. In order to reduce the heat transfer back to the indoor environment through the inner surface, insulation of the diaphragm wall are analyzed. This study can provide a reference for the analysis of the feasibility and application of diaphragm wall in deep-buried engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".