MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981930254 · doi:10.1145/3341301.3359650

The inflection point hypothesis

2019· article· en· W2981930254 on OpenAlexafffund
Yongle Zhang, Kirk Rodrigues, Yu Luo, Michael Stumm, Ding Yuan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVMwareNetApp
KeywordsRoot causePrefixComputer scienceRoot (linguistics)Root cause analysisTest suiteSequence (biology)Construct (python library)Inflection pointPoint (geometry)Parallel computingTest caseProgramming languageReliability engineeringMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The end goal of failure diagnosis is to locate the root cause. Prior root cause localization approaches almost all rely on statistical analysis. This paper proposes taking a different approach based on the observation that if we model an execution as a totally ordered sequence of instructions, then the root cause can be identified by the first instruction where the failure execution deviates from the non-failure execution that has the longest instruction sequence prefix in common with that of the failure execution. Thus, root cause analysis is transformed into a principled search problem to identify the non-failure execution with the longest common prefix. We present Kairux, a tool that does just that. It is, in most cases, capable of pinpointing the root cause of a failure in a distributed system, in a fully automated way. Kairux uses tests from the system's rich unit test suite as building blocks to construct the non-failure execution that has the longest common prefix with the failure execution in order to locate the root cause. By evaluating Kairux on some of the most complex, real-world failures from HBase, HDFS, and ZooKeeper, we show that Kairux can accurately pinpoint each failure's respective root cause.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207