MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981939302 · doi:10.4095/216759

Maturation thermique, potentiel roche mère des roches ordoviciennes à dévoniennes du nord-ouest du Nouveau-Brunswick

2005· report· en· W2981939302 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. Bertrand, M Malo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: A study of organic matter petrography and geochemistry is carried out on 160 samples from lower and middle Paleozoic rocks in northwestem New Brunswick. The study aims to document potential hydrocarbon source rocks and thermal maturity of these successions. Geological context: The successions form part of a successor basin that unconf ormably overlies Cambrian-Ordovician basement rocks of the Appalachians Dunnage and Gander zones. The successions crop out in three structural elements - from south to north : the Chaleurs Bay synclinorium, the Aroostook-Percé anticlinorium and the Gaspé-Connecticut Valley synclinorium. These elements are bordered by major faults and other faults divide these elements into distinct tectonic blocks. Two folding episodes are recognized. The successor basin comprises seven lithostratigraphic groups mostly dominated by siliciclastic sediments which cover the Upper Ordovician to Middle Devonian interval : the Grog Brook, Matapédia, Chaleurs, Perham, Dalhousie, Gaspé Sandstones and Fortin groups. Source rock potential: The hydrocarbon source rock potential ofthese successions is evaluated on the results of the Total Organic Carbon, the programmed pyrolysis(Rock Eval) and the petrographic characteristics oftheir kerogens. The Middle Ordovician Popelogan Formation of the underlying Dunnage zone and the Ritchie Brook Member of the upper part of the Boland Brook Formation (Upper Ordovician Grog Brook Group) are the best hydrocarbon source rocks of the area and have generated significant amounts of liquid and gas hydrocarbons. Sorne coal beds found at the top of the volcano-sedimentary pile (Val d' Amour and Campbellton formations) are also potential source rocks. However, these are immature and no hydrocarbons have been generated from these coals. Thermal maturation - nature-intensity-correlation with tectonic events: The thermal maturation of the rock succession in northwestem New Brunswick covers a wide range of equivalent vitrinite reflectance values (0.36% to 8.9%). This range encompasses the immature hydrocarbon zone to the metamorphic greenschist facies. Even if sedimentary burial plays a critical role in the thermal maturation of the succession, this burial is highly variable from one area to the other. Therefore, most of the sedimentary units cover a wide range of thermal ran1cs regardless of their position in the sedimentary pile. Two areas are favourable for the preservation of liquid hydrocarbons. Of these, the Restigouche syncline, which is limited by the Sellarsville and Black Lake faults, is the best documented. The second one is restricted to a tectonic block limited by the Jacket River Pointe Arleau Brook fault to the west and by an unnamed fault to the east. With the exception of these two latter cases, all successions that crop out to the west of the tectonic blocks limited by the major strike-slip faults (Restigouche, McKenzie Gulch, Rocky Brook-Millstream, Jacket River-Pointe Arleau Brook faults) are in the dry gas zone. The successions to the east of these blocks are usually in the overmature to metamorphic domains. The thermal maturation post-dates the first NW-SE folding phase, but is more or less coeval with the second NE-SW folding phase. The thermal maturation post-dates the Silurian

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→