MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981942359 · doi:10.4095/298895

Seismic stratigraphy of the Paleozoic succession and subsurface mapping of the Macasty Formation in Jupiter River area, Anticosti Island, Quebec, Canada

2016· report· en· W2981942359 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mathieu J. Duchesne, Nicolas Pinet, V Brake, Denis Lavoie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleozoicEcological successionGeologyStratigraphyPaleontologyArchaeologyGeographyTectonicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents the methodology used for the processing and interpretation of seismic reflection data in the Jupiter River area of the Anticosti Island. The seismic characteristics of the rock formations investigated are described and time-structure maps of the tops of the Mingan and Macasty formations are presented as well as a map documenting the thickness variation of the Macasty Formation. Subsurface maps present time and thickness estimations that take into account exploration wells and regional seismic data, yet are limited by the spatial distribution and vertical resolution of seismic data. Time-structure maps of the top Mingan and Macasty formations portray a shallow and a deep domain delimited by the Jupiter Fault which probably corresponds to a composite structure with several 'en échelon' fault segments. The thickness map of the Macasty Formation reveals thicker accumulation and/or preservation of this unit within a NW-SE fairway bounded to the northeast by the Jupiter Fault and to the southwest by the Ruisseau Jean IV and the Rivière du Brick faults. North of the Jupiter Fault the Macasty Formation is considerably thinner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→