MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981942826 · doi:10.4095/298809

Preliminary investigations of unconsolidated sediments overlying the Leech River fault zone, southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia

2016· report· en· W2981942826 on OpenAlexaffabout
J M Bednarski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeechGeologyFault (geology)ArchaeologyOceanographySeismologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Leech River fault zone lies near the city of Victoria, British Columbia. Although this fault zone has been considered to be inactive for millions of years, two large paleo-earthquakes have been identified on its eastern extension, only 40 km from the city. Confirmation of an active fault in proximity to an urban centre or a part of critical infrastructure would fundamentally change the analysis of seismic hazard. To determine the occurrence of more recent faulting, younger sediments overlying the faulted bedrock were surveyed by high resolution Lidar topography, ground penetrating radar, electrical resistivity, and shallow seismic reflection lines. Targeted areas included surface scarps and transects crossing the bedrock structure in search of disturbed sediment that may be attributed to recent faulting. Preliminary results do not find conclusive evidence of active faulting in the youngest sediment dating from postglacial time, at least in the upper 5 to 10 m; however, the seismic reflection survey found deeper, faulted deposits dating from at least the last glaciation and warrant further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→