MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981944902 · doi:10.4095/222523

Interim report on the characterization of Jean Marie gas reservoir facies in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia

2006· report· en· W2981944902 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jack Wendte, D G Sargent, Ihsan S. Al‐Aasm

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaciesInterimGeologyArchaeologyGeochemistryGeomorphologyGeographyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report provides a summary of the stratigraphic evolution of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) and a characterization of its major reservoir facies from the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia. Six cross-sections, based on the description of 18 m cores from 18 wells, show the cyclic makeup of the Jean Marie Member and the distribution of its major depositional facies. An interpretive cross-section, based on the distribution of facies in these cross-sections, provides a model illustrating the evolution of the Jean Marie Member in the July Lake area. Three main growth stages are identified. In the July Lake area, three major reservoir facies are recognized. Pore networks in these reservoir facies are highly variable because of the interaction of depositional, diagenetic and tectonic processes. In addition, the results of the initial stable and radiogenic isotopic analyses of the main diagenetic components are made available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→