MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A thermodynamic investigation and optimization of an ejector refrigeration system using R1233zd(E) as a working fluid

2019· article· en· W2981950905 on OpenAlexaff
Aggrey Mwesigye, Amir Kiamari, Seth B. Dworkin

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefrigerantRefrigerationInjectorEvaporatorWorking fluidRenewable energyCooling capacityWaste heatAir conditioningEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringEnergy consumptionThermodynamicsNuclear engineeringAutomotive engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringHeat exchangerElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing contribution of heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration systems to energy consumption and global warming is driving the search for technologies that are energy efficient, clean and renewable. The ejector refrigeration system is one such system with the potential to reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions. It is simple, low cost, has no moving parts, and can use low grade heat sources such as solar or waste heat. However, the coefficients of performance (COP) of these systems are still low. Moreover, most studies on ejector refrigeration systems have used refrigerants that are not environmentally benign. In this paper, the performance of an ejector refrigeration system working with R1233zd(E) is numerically investigated. R1233zd(E) is a newly introduced Hydroflouroolefin refrigerant with no ozone depletion potential and very low global warming potential. No studies on the performance of this refrigerant in ejector systems have been conducted. A novel mathematical model that uses ejector coefficients which are dependent on the evaporator and generator pressures to accurately determine performance was used in the present study. In the analysis, area ratios between 6.44 and 10.94, evaporator temperatures between 0 and 16°C, and generator temperatures between 70 and 110°C were considered. Results show that system performance in the critical mode of operation increases as the generator temperature reduces and as the evaporator temperature increases. Furthermore, there is an optimal generator temperature at each condensing and evaporator temperature with the highest COP. Correlations for the optimal generator temperature and optimal COP have been derived and presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207