MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981962385 · doi:10.4095/297560

Refining lithological and structural understanding of the southern Core Zone, northern Quebec and Labrador in support of mineral resource assessment

2016· report· en· W2981962385 on OpenAlexaffabout
M Sanborn-Barrie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyResource (disambiguation)Mineral resource classificationGeochemistryRefining (metallurgy)MineralMineral explorationCore (optical fiber)Earth scienceMining engineeringEcologyChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated mapping of the southern New Québec Orogen - Core Zone as part of the second phase of Geomapping for Energy and Minerals (GEM-2) is providing insight into the collisional orogen between the Superior and North Atlantic cratons by investigating the composition, age and architecture of intervening crust at a scale that will bridge knowledge of Archean and Paleoproterozoic tectonomagmatic evolution across the Quebec - Labrador border. In 2014, bedrock mapping of seventy-five localities investigated clastic and carbonate rocks of the Kaniapiscau Supergroup (eastern Labrador Trough), mafic metavolcanic rocks of the Doublet Zone, granitoid basement and unconformably overlying metasedimentary rocks of the Laporte domain, orthogneissic basement and the cross-cutting 1837-1820 Ma De Pas Batholith, and a collage of supracrustal rocks and associated gabbroic plutons that attain upper amphibolite to granulite facies (migmatitic Mistinibi domain) east of the De Pas batholith. 2014 observations were assessed in light of previous understanding of this region and a number of questions or knowledge gaps were identified which formed the basis for supporting laboratory analysis and targetted mapping in 2015. Bedrock findings are being integrated with surficial mapping, till analysis and glacial dispersion studies, collectively contributing knowledge for increased exploration effectiveness across this part of Quebec and Labrador.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207