Gridded Visibility Products over Marine Environments Based on Artificial Neural Network Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reconstruction and monitoring of visibility over marine environments is critically important because of a lack of observations. To travel safely in marine environments, a high quality of visibility data is needed to evaluate navigation risk. Currently, although visibility is available through numerical weather prediction models as well as ground and spaceborne remote sensing platforms and ship measurements, issues still exist over the remote marine environments and northern latitudes. To improve visibility prediction and reduce navigational risks, gridded visibility data based on artificial neural network analysis can be used over marine environments, and the problem can be regarded as an air quality prediction problem based on machine learning algorithms. This new method based on artificial intelligence techniques developed here is tested over the Indian Ocean. The mean error of the inferred visibility from the artificial neural network analysis is found to be less than 8.0%. The results suggested that satellite-based optical thickness and numerical model-based reanalysis data can be used to infer gridded visibility values based on artificial neural network analysis, and that could help us reconstruct and monitor surface gridded visibility values over marine and remote environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".