MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981989880 · doi:10.1109/tcns.2019.2948990

Robust Stabilization of Input-Affine Nonlinear Systems Under Network Constraints

2019· article· en· W2981989880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEmulationNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Affine transformationComputer scienceProperty (philosophy)Robust controlRobustness (evolution)Event (particle physics)Controller (irrigation)Class (philosophy)Stability (learning theory)Control engineeringControl (management)MathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advent of event-triggered control, the input-to-state stable (ISS) assumption proved to be a powerful tool in designing triggering rules, especially when dealing with nonlinear systems. In this article, we propose a robust stabilizing event-triggered controller for an input-affine class of nonlinear systems. Rather than relying on the ISS property as a pre-existing condition, we provide sufficient conditions for the ISS condition to hold and then employ the proposed conditions to stabilize the event-triggered system. Moreover, our approach guarantees the isolation of sampling instants in the presence of arbitrary disturbances. Our proposed design covers both emulation and joint design methods. The results are finally validated through a compelling example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it