MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981998262 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2972

Discovery of a large H i ring around the quiescent galaxy AGC 203001

2019· article· en· W2981998262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Omkar Bait, Sushma Kurapati, Pierre–Alain Duc, Jean‐Charles Cuillandre, Yogesh Wadadekar, P. Kamphuis, Sudhanshu Barway

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGiant Metrewave Radio TelescopeRing (chemistry)AstrophysicsGalaxySurface brightnessAstronomyStar formationTelescopeStarsGreen Bank TelescopeRadio galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Here we report the discovery with the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope of an extremely large (∼115 kpc in diameter) H i ring, located around a massive quenched galaxy, AGC 203001, but off-centered, with respect to it. This ring does not have any bright extended optical counterpart unlike several other known ring galaxies. Our deep g, r, and i optical imaging of the H i ring, using the MegaCam instrument on the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, shows however several regions with faint optical emission at a surface brightness level of ∼28 mag/arcsec2. Such an extended H i structure is very rare with only one other case known so far – the Leo ring. Conventionally, off-centered rings have been explained by a collision with an “intruder” galaxy leading to expanding density waves of gas and stars in the form of a ring. However, in such a scenario the impact also leads to large amounts of star formation in the ring which is not observed in the ring presented in this paper. We discuss possible scenarios for the formation of such H i dominated rings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→