MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981999423 · doi:10.4095/306157

Report of activities for GEM-2 reconnaissance surficial geology, Indin Lake, Northwest Territories, NTS 86-B: GEM-2 Mackenzie Project

2017· report· en· W2981999423 on OpenAlexaffabout
D E Kerr, H B O'Neill

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArchaeologyPhysical geographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The glaciated landscape within the study area exhibits large-scale ice flow features such as drumlinoids, crag-and-tails, fluted bedrock, as well as striations, which record westward to southwestward ice flow during the last glaciation. Glacially scoured bedrock dominates the map area. Discontinuous till veneer occurs throughout the map area. Glaciofluvial landforms, including eskers, kames, and outwash plains, are part of meltwater corridors that generally trend westward and southwestward. During deglaciation, which began about 10.5 ka BP, a small number of recessional moraines were formed. Glaciolacustrine sediments, associated with Glacial Lake McConnell, were deposited in the southwestern regions. Associated glaciolacustrine deltas and beaches occur between 290-330 m elevation, marking high lake levels associated with the position of the eastward receding ice front during deglaciation. Isolated deltas unrelated to Glacial Lake McConnell were observed at 370 m and 390 m elevation. Postglacial eolian sediments exhibit dunes recording both north-northwestward and south-southeastward paleowind directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→