fMRI functional connectivity as an indicator of interictal epileptic discharges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between functional connectivity and presence of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) in different brain regions in intracranial EEG (iEEG). METHODS: We studied 38 focal epilepsy patients who underwent simultaneous EEG/fMRI scanning and subsequent intracerebral stereo-EEG investigation. In EEG/fMRI analysis, IEDs with different spatial distributions were considered independent studies and IED-related maximal BOLD responses were evaluated. Studies with iEEG electrodes inside the maximal responses were selected and divided into three groups: Studies with 1. distinct maximal BOLD highly concordant with seizure-onset-zone (SOZ); 2. Moderate maximal BOLD concordant with SOZ; 3. maximal BOLD discordant with SOZ. Using maximal BOLD as seed, its functionally connected zone (FCZ) was determined. IED rates in iEEG channels inside and outside the FCZ were compared in the three groups. The effect of laterality and distance between channels and maximal BOLD, and correlation between functional connectivity values and IED rates were analyzed. RESULTS: ) and the inside-outside difference remained after regressing distance and laterality factors. In Group 1, connectivity values were significantly correlated with IED rates in channels inside the FCZ (p < 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate a higher probability of finding intracranial IEDs in the FCZ of SOZ-concordant maximal BOLD responses than in other regions, regardless of distance and laterality. In studies with distinct maximal BOLD, connectivity values can partially predict IED rates in intracranial EEG. It is thus feasible to non-invasively delineate brain regions that are likely to have high IED rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".