MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982004091 · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17033

Effects of wheat straw chop length in high-straw dry cow diets on intake, health, and performance of dairy cows across the transition period

2019· article· en· W2982004091 on OpenAlexaff
Casey Havekes, T.F. Duffield, A.J. Carpenter, T.J. DeVries

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDry matterStrawIce calvingAnimal scienceSilageLatin squareTotal mixed rationNeutral Detergent FiberLactationLactoseDairy cattleBiologyAgronomyRumenFood sciencePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study investigated the effect of chop length of wheat straw in a high-straw dry cow diet on the feeding behavior, health, and performance of Holstein dairy cows across the transition period. Forty cows were enrolled at dry off, approximately 45 d before expected calving, and assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments containing (on a dry matter basis) 36% corn silage, 35% dry cow pellet, and 29% wheat straw. Diets were formulated to target an energy consumption of 19 Mcal/d of net energy for lactation per cow. The diets differed in the chop length of wheat straw: (1) long straw chopped with a 10.16-cm screen (LDD; n = 20), or (2) short straw chopped with a 2.54-cm screen (SDD; n = 20). Dietary treatments were fed throughout the dry period. Feeding behavior, rumination time, and reticulorumen pH were monitored electronically, and feed samples were collected to determine feed sorting. Blood samples were taken weekly, and body condition scores and body weights were taken every 2 wk. Postcalving, all cows were fed the same lactating cow total mixed ration for 28 d; the same measurements were recorded with the addition of daily milk yield and twice weekly milk components. During the dry period, cows fed the SDD treatment consumed more dry matter (15.6 vs. 15.0 kg/d), had more consistent dry matter intake in the week leading up to calving, had a faster feeding rate, consumed 0.4 kg/meal more, and had 0.6 fewer meals per day. No differences were observed in rumination time or mean reticulorumen pH between treatments in both the dry and lactating period. Regardless of treatment during the dry period, cows sorted against the long particles (>19 mm) and in favor of the short particles (<8, >4 mm), but cows fed the LDD treatment sorted to a greater extent than cows fed the SDD treatment. Dietary treatment in the dry period did not influence feed sorting behavior postcalving. Cows fed the LDD treatment had a greater daily change (decline) in rumen pH in the first week postcalving and had a greater blood β-hydroxybutyrate concentration in the third week postcalving. Overall, the results from this study indicate that feeding shorter chopped wheat straw in a high-straw dry cow diet improved intake, reduced sorting during the dry period, and resulted in greater metabolic health and rumen stability in early lactation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207