MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2982011622 · doi:10.4095/219865

RADARSAT-1 Applied to the Mapping of Tropical Rain Forest: A Case Study in Guyana

2002· report· en· W2982011622 on OpenAlexaff
J.J. van der Sanden

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTropical rain forestTropical forestGeographyEnvironmental scienceRainforestClimatologyRemote sensingForestryGeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential of RADARSAT-1 Fine mode images for application to the assessment of tropical forest types and the monitoring of industrial selective logging were investigated using data acquired over Mabura Hill, Guyana. This study area supports a nearly complete tropical moist forest cover that comprises a total of six forest types, i.e. five types of primary forest and logged-over forest. Image texture, not backscatter, was identified as the principal source of information for the applications at issue. Texturally enhanced RADARSAT-1 Fine mode image products were found to offer moderate potential for both the assessment of tropical forest types and the monitoring of selective logging by means of visual interpretation. Furthermore, RADARSAT-1 Fine mode images were found to make moderate bases for automated classification of tropical forests by means of textural attributes computed per region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications→French-language works237,207→