Hydrocarbon assessment summary report of Mountain River, Keele River, Ravensthroat/Redstone River, and Drum Lake areas of interest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this report is to present a hydrocarbon resource potential assessment of Mountain River, Keele River, Ravensthroat/Redstone River, and Drum Lake areas of interest. The four areas examined here are located in the Mackenzie Mountains, and together cover an area in excess of 25,000 km2. The geology of the Mackenzie Mountains is characterized by uplifted, faulted and folded Proterozoic, Paleozoic and Mesozoic carbonate and siliciclastic rocks. Although adequate potential source and reservoir rocks are present throughout the Mackenzie Mountains, their overall hydrocarbon potential is low. Because much of the potential reservoirs are exposed at surface, there is an increased risk of reservoir breaching, or flushing and/or degradation of hydrocarbons by meteoritic or ground water. Much of Mountain River, Keele River, Ravensthroat/Redstone River, and Drum Lake areas of interest have low hydrocarbon potential; the potential is higher where the areas of interest are underlain by the Plateau Overthrust play.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".