MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982054357 · doi:10.4095/220605

Surficial geology, Hay River, Alberta

2005· report· en· W2982054357 on OpenAlexaffabout
I R Smith, A Plouffe, R C Paulen, M.M. Fenton, J.G. Pawlowicz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHayGeologyHydrology (agriculture)ArchaeologyGeographyGeotechnical engineeringAgronomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This 1:100 000 scale map represents a product of the Shallow Gas and Diamond Opportunities in Northern Alberta and British Columbia project (NRD 4450) conducted by the Geological Survey of Canada (Natural Resources Canada), Alberta Geological Survey (Alberta Energy and Utilities Board), and Resource Development and Geoscience Branch (British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines). Surficial geology maps covering the rest of the 1:250 000 (NTS) 84L map area are published by Plouffe et al. (2004) and Paulen et al. (2005a, b). Prior to commencement of field activities, black and white, 1:60 000 scale airphotos (Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, 1994) were scanned for the Hay River map area (NTS 84L/SW). Preliminary surficial geology interpretations were drawn on the airphotos, and then subsequently ground truthed in the field. Fieldwork was mainly conducted in summer 2003, with additional site surveys in summer and fall, 2004. Field activities included: 1) inspection, logging and characterization of surficial geology from truck, foot traverse and helicopter field surveys of exposures along cutbanks, borrow pits, gravel pits, seismic line trenching activities, as well as from hand-dug and augered holes, 2) sampling of till at a reconnaissance scale (1 sample per 25 km2) for geochemistry, particle-size, carbonate content, and kimberlite indicator minerals, 3) measurement of clast fabrics from tills and paleocurrent directions from fluvially deposited material. The Hay River map area is part of the Fort Nelson Lowlands physiographic region and is blanketed by Boreal forest (white and black spruce, aspen, lodgepole pine) and extensive bogs and fens. Soils are generally poorly drained, commonly with shallow water tables, reflecting the high clay content of the tills (10-40%) in which they have formed. In raised areas, where soil development is more advanced, gray luvisols predominate. Static and turbic cryosols are found in regions of sporadic discontinuous permafrost, and solonetzic soils are found in areas of thin drift overlying marine shale bedrock. Outcrops of Cretaceous Dunvegan Formation sandstone are found in the southern uplands (>600 m above sea level) of the map area, while outcrops of Cretaceous Fort St. John Group shales (Shaftesbury Formation) are found in the south-central region of the map area along cut-banks of former glacial meltwater canyons and channels. The Hay River flows east to west through a conspicuous glacial meltwater canyon (which incorporates Rainbow Lake) in the central part of the map area. This meltwater canyon is considered to have formed both sub-glacially and ice-marginally, and likely served as the outlet of glacial Lake Peace into the Fontas-Nelson River system to the west during the late Indian Creek stage of Mathews (1980).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207