MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimization of DND Multi-Depot Split-Load Pickup-Delivery Problem

2019· article· en· W2982060258 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abdeslem Boukhtouta, Sujoy Ray, Andrei Soeanu, Raman Pall, Jean Berger

Bibliographic record

VenueMATEC Web of Conferences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsPublic Safety CanadaDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPickupHeuristicComputer scienceDescent (aeronautics)Mathematical optimizationGround transportationVehicle routing problemDepotRange (aeronautics)Greedy algorithmOperations researchTransport engineeringEngineeringRouting (electronic design automation)Computer networkMathematicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a solution approach to optimize vehicle routes for a multi-depot, multi-vehicle, pickup and delivery problem over a large ground transportation network. More precisely, we address ground transportation of orders for the Canadian Department of National Defence using heterogeneous vehicle fleets. The fleets consist of limited number of organizational vehicles hosted at pre-established depots and commercial order delivery services. The proposed approach involves leveraging an insertion cost gradient-descent heuristic followed by a greedy randomized adaptive search procedure. Experimental results generated using the historical orders of the organization indicate that the developed approach is effective in handling a wide range of scenarios and may generate near-optimal vehicle routes with an annual transportation cost reduction between 7.7% and 16.7%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMATEC Web of ConferencesSame topicVehicle Routing Optimization MethodsFrench-language works237,207