MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982065423

Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies three new risk loci for atopic dermatitis

2012· article· en· W2982065423 on OpenAlexaff
Lavinia Paternoster, Marie Standl, Chih‐Mei Chen, Adaikalavan Ramasamy, Klaus Bønnelykke, Liesbeth Duijts, Manuel A. R. Ferreira, Alexessander Couto Alves, Jacob P. Thyssen, Eva Albrecht, Hansjörg Baurecht, Bjarke Feenstra, Patrick Sleiman, Pirro G. Hysi, Nicole M. Warrington, Ivan Curjuric, Ronny Myhre, John A. Curtin, Maria M. Groen‐Blokhuis, Marjan Kerkhof, Annika Sääf, André Franke, David Ellinghaus, R. Foelster‐Holst, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis, Stephen B. Montgomery, Holger Prokisch, Katharina Heim, Anna‐Liisa Hartikainen, Anneli Pouta, Juha Pekkanen, Alexandra I. F. Blakemore, Jessica L. Buxton, Marika Kaakinen, David L. Duffy, Pamela A. F. Madden, Andrew C. Heath, Grant W. Montgomery, Philip J. Thompson, Melanie C. Matheson, Peter N. Le Souëf, Beaté St Pourcain, George Davey Smith, John Henderson, John P. Kemp, Nicholas J. Timpson, Panos Deloukas, Susan M. Ring, H‐Erich Wichmann, Martina Müller‐Nurasyid, Natalija Novak, Norman Klopp, Elke Rodríguez, Wendy L. McArdle, Allan Linneberg, Torkil Menné, Ellen A. Nøhr, Albert Hofman, André G. Uitterlinden, Cornelia M. van Duijin, Fernando Rivadeneira, Johan C. de Jongste, Ralf J.P. van der Valk, Matthias Wjst, Rain Jögi, Frank Geller, Heather A. Boyd, Jeffrey C. Murray, Cecilia Kim, Frank Mentch, Michael March, Massimo Mangino, Tim D. Spector, Véronique Bataille, Craig E. Pennell, Patrick G. Holt, Peter D. Sly, Carla M. T. Tiesler, Elisabeth Thiering, Thomas Illig, Medea Imboden, Wenche Nystad, Angela Simpson, Jouke‐Jan Hottenga, Dirkje Postma, Gerard H. Koppelman, Henriëtte A. Smit, Cilla Söderhäll, Bo Chawes, Eskil Kreiner‐Møller, Hans Bisgaard, Erik Melén, Dorret I. Boomsma, Adnan Čustović, Bo Jacobsson, Nicole Probst‐Hensch, Lyle J. Palmer, Daniel Glass, Håkon Håkonarson, Mads Melbye, Deborah Jarvis, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe, Christian Gieger, David P. Strachan, Nicholas G. Martin, Marjo‐Riitta Järvelin, Joachim Heinrich, David M. Evans, Stephan Weidinger

Bibliographic record

VenueUWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilaggrinAtopic dermatitisGenome-wide association studyBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsLocus (genetics)Immune dysregulationGenetic associationOdds ratioPopulationDiseaseImmunologyGeneImmune systemMedicineGenotypePathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a commonly occurring chronic skin disease with high heritability. Apart from filaggrin (FLG), the genes influencing atopic dermatitis are largely unknown. We conducted a genome-wide association meta-analysis of 5,606 affected individuals and 20,565 controls from 16 population-based cohorts and then examined the ten most strongly associated new susceptibility loci in an additional 5,419 affected individuals and 19,833 controls from 14 studies. Three SNPs reached genome-wide significance in the discovery and replication cohorts combined, including rs479844 upstream of OVOL1 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.88, P = 1.1 × 10(-13)) and rs2164983 near ACTL9 (OR = 1.16, P = 7.1 × 10(-9)), both of which are near genes that have been implicated in epidermal proliferation and differentiation, as well as rs2897442 in KIF3A within the cytokine cluster at 5q31.1 (OR = 1.11, P = 3.8 × 10(-8)). We also replicated association with the FLG locus and with two recently identified association signals at 11q13.5 (rs7927894; P = 0.008) and 20q13.33 (rs6010620; P = 0.002). Our results underline the importance of both epidermal barrier function and immune dysregulation in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.016
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)Same topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207