MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982068713 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00761

Exploring Differences Between Adolescents and Adults With Perinatal Depression—Data From the Expanding Care for Perinatal Women With Depression Trial in Nigeria

2019· article· en· W2982068713 on OpenAlexafffund
Bibilola Oladeji, Toyin Bello, Lola Kola, Ricardo Araya, Phyllis Zelkowitz, Oye Gureje

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersGrand Challenges Canada
KeywordsMedicineEdinburgh Postnatal Depression ScalePregnancyPostpartum depressionDepression (economics)Antenatal depressionPsychosocialBirth weightPsychological interventionGestational agePediatricsObstetricsPsychiatryAnxietyDepressive symptoms

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Depression is common among women in the perinatal period. Although pregnancy and motherhood among adolescents are a global public health issue, little is known about how adolescents differ from adults in the occurrence and correlates of perinatal depression. Methods: Data was derived from a cluster randomized controlled trial of psychosocial interventions for perinatal depression in primary maternal care in Nigeria (the EXPONATE trial). Adolescents and adult participants recruited during pregnancy, and followed up till 6-months postpartum were compared on: proportions with depression (screening positive to depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) (score ≥12) and meeting the DSM-IV criteria using the short form of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview); adjustment and attitude to pregnancy and motherhood (using the Maternal Adjustment and Maternal Attitudes scale); and parenting skills (measured on Infant-Toddler version of the Home Inventory for Measurement of the Environment (HOME-IT)). Infant and fetal growth were assessed by measures of weight and head circumference at birth and upper mid-arm circumference (MUAC) at 6 months. Results: Of 8580 adults screened, 6.9% had major depression compared to 17.7% of 772 screened adolescents (p <0.001). Adolescents had significantly poorer adjustment and attitudes to pregnancy, lower mean fetal gestational age at birth and a smaller mean baby’s birth weight. At 6 months postpartum there were no significant differences in the rates of remission from depression between adolescent and adult women (EPDS score <6). Adolescent mothers continued to have poorer maternal attitudes and parenting skills indicated by significantly lower scores on the HOME-IT responsivity and involvement sub-scales. Infants of adolescent mothers had a higher rate of undernutrition (defined as MUAC <12.5cm) compared to those of adult mothers: 14.8% and 6.3% respectively (p=0.008), with the mean MUAC remaining significantly lower for infants of adolescent mothers after adjusting for their lower birthweight (p=0.04). Conclusion: Perinatal depression is more common and is associated with poorer maternal attitudes and parenting skills in adolescents compared to adults. Evidence from this exploratory study suggests that improving outcomes in infants of adolescent mothers with perinatal depression, depression treatment may need to be supplemented with specific approaches to improve parenting skills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207