MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982080765 · doi:10.4095/305912

Epidote associated with the porphyry Cu-Mo mineralization at the Gibraltar deposit, south-central British Columbia

2017· report· en· W2982080765 on OpenAlexaffabout
C H Kobylinski, Kéiko Hattori, A Plouffe, S W Smith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidoteMineralization (soil science)GeologyGeochemistryPorphyry copper depositSeismologyHydrothermal circulationPaleontologyFluid inclusionsSoil scienceQuartz

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gibraltar porphyry-copper molybdenum deposit in the Canadian Cordillera is hosted by the late Triassic, Granite Mountain Batholith (GMB). The batholith is tonalitic and composed of quartz, plagioclase and minor hornblende and biotite in various modality. The rocks in the batholith show phyllic and propylitic alteration. Propylitic alteration (green rock alteration) is characterised by epidote, chlorite, albite, and is extensive throughout the batholith. The name epidote is used in this paper for epidote group minerals which include clinozoisite, epidote (sensu stricto), allanite, ferriepidote and ferriallanite. Epidote occurs as dissemination, isolated grains, and aggregates, and forms mono-minerallic veins and epidote-bearing veins in the batholith. These veins (>2 cm in width) in the batholith generally strike towards the mineralized centre. Epidote enclosed by chalcopyrite or pyrite is compositionally homogeneous and Fe-poor, suggesting that Fe is preferentially incorporated into sulphides and that epidote crystallized together with sulphide minerals. Individual grains of epidote in epidote-bearing veins show compositional zoning with Fe-poor cores and Fe-rich rims. Epidote grains disseminated in the batholith show similar compositional zoning with Fe-poor cores and Fe-rich rims. Allanite and REE-rich epidote are identified in the GMB less than 2 km from mineralization and within the Burgess Creek Stock (10 km from mineralization). Epidote containing 0.01 -1 wt.% REEs is common in grains forming aggregates throughout GMB. Epidote with high REEs (> 1 wt.% REEs) occurs only in rocks with a bulk composition >70 ppm REEs. Compositional zoning of epidote suggests that the hydrothermal history of the GMB comprised of early S-rich hydrothermal activity, followed by S-poor barren hydrothermal activity. Epidote in the Nicola volcanics and Cuisson Lake Unit near the GMB is homogeneous and Fe-rich and commonly contains inclusions of apatite and titanite. The contents of REEs in epidote in the Nicola volcanics are all below the detection limits of SEM (1000 - 5000 ppm) and EPMA (La, 470 ppm; Ce, 380 ppm; Pr, 640 ppm; Nd, 330 ppm).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207