Le roman contre la barbarie : récits d’un engagement pour le vivre ensemble dans la littérature marocaine d’expression française de la Nouvelle Génération
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article tente de montrer que le roman marocain de la nouvelle génération est marqué, tant sur le plan thématique que formel, par un désir de dévoilement, c’est-à-dire, d’une part, par le souci permanent de mettre des mots sur les entraves qui sabordent les tentatives de construction de « l’éthos d’un vivre ensemble démocratique. » et, d’autre part, par la volonté de mener une réflexion approfondie sur les dérives qui pourraient éventuellement résulter de cette impasse. La mise en fiction des mutations sociales et des tensions politiques et religieuses fait des romanciers marocains, non seulement, des observateurs attentifs de leur propre société, mais aussi et surtout des acteurs engagés dans son changement.Que ce soit d’une manière latente, affichée ou autoproclamée, c’est la capacité de déchiffrer les conflits qui déchirent la société contemporaine et le désir de repenser « le vivre ensemble » dans l’optique de le panser, qui animent leur production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".