Real-Time Infrared Motion Tracking Analysis for Patients Treated With Gated Frameless Image Guided Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The transition from frame-based brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to frameless delivery is supported by real-time intrafraction monitoring to ensure accurate delivery. The purpose of this study is to characterize these real-time motion traces in a large cohort of patients treated with frameless gated brain SRS and to develop patient-specific predictions of tolerance violations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: SRS patients treated on the Gamma Knife Icon were immobilized using a device-specific thermoplastic head mask. A motion marker was fixed to the patient's nose, with gating and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based corrections to the treatment at excursions from baseline exceeding 1.5 mm. The traces of 1446 fractions were analyzed according to magnitude (932 unique treatment plans for 462 unique individual patients), directional distribution of displacement, and stability. A neural network model was developed to predict interruptions based on a subset of trace data. RESULTS: The average displacement of the marker in the first fraction of all patients was 0.62 ± 0.25 mm with beam CBCT corrections, which would otherwise be modeled at 0.96 ± 0.96 mm without intrafraction motion correction (P < .0001). Twenty-nine percent of fractions delivered were interrupted, of which the Z-axis (superoinferior) motion was the largest contributor to excursion. Baseline corrections significantly compensated for the magnitude of motion in all 3 dimensions (P < .01). The motion relative to the first acquired CBCT was on average seen to consistently increase with treatment time, with the minimum P value occurring at 61.3 minutes. The neural network prediction model was able to predict treatment interruptions with 84% sensitivity on the first 5-minute sample of the trace. CONCLUSIONS: Corrections to marker position significantly decreased marker excursions in all 3 axes compared with a single CBCT alignment. Patient-specific modeling may aid in the optimization of cases selected for frameless radiosurgery to increase the accuracy of planned delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".