MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982216862 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10685

Leffingwell Odor Dataset

2019· preprint· en· W2982216862 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamín Sánchez-Lengeling, Jennifer N. Wei, Brian K. Lee, Richard C. Gerkin, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik, Alexander B. Wiltschko

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionOdorComputer scienceGraphMachine learningArtificial intelligenceSet (abstract data type)Artificial neural networkRepresentation (politics)Cognitive scienceSensory systemPsychologyCognitive psychologyNeuroscienceTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<strong>NOTE: It's easier to download this dataset from pyrfume. Here's how:</strong> <pre><code># First install pyrfume in your Python environment. This can be done easily with pip. # pip install pyrfume import pyrfume molecules = pyrfume.load_data('leffingwell/molecules.csv', remote=True) behavior = pyrfume.load_data('leffingwell/behavior.csv', remote=True) # e.g. to count the number of molecules with each descriptor behavior.sum().sort_values(ascending=False).astype(int) </code></pre> Predicting properties of molecules is an area of growing research in machine learning, particularly as models for learning from graph-valued inputs improve in sophistication and robustness. A molecular property prediction problem that has received comparatively little attention during this surge in research activity is building Structure-Odor Relationships (SOR) models (as opposed to Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, a term from medicinal chemistry). This is a 70+ year-old problem straddling chemistry, physics, neuroscience, and machine learning. To spur development on the SOR problem, we curated and cleaned a dataset of 3523 molecules associated with expert-labeled odor descriptors from the <em>Leffingwell PMP 2001</em> database. We provide featurizations of all molecules in the dataset using bit-based and count-based fingerprints, Mordred molecular descriptors, and the embeddings from our trained GNN model (Sanchez-Lengeling et al., 2019). This dataset is comprised of two files: <strong>leffingwell_data.csv</strong>: this contains molecular structures, and what they smell like, along with train, test, and cross-validation splits. More detail on the file structure is found in leffingwell_readme.pdf. <strong>leffingwell_embeddings.npz</strong>: this contains several featurizations of the molecules in the dataset. <strong>leffingwell_readme.pdf</strong>: a more detailed description of the data and its provenance, including expected performance metrics. <strong>LICENSE</strong>: a copy of the CC-BY-NC license language. The dataset, and all associated features, is freely available for research use under the CC-BY-NC license. If you use the data in a publication, please cite: <pre>@article{sanchez2019machine, title={Machine learning for scent: Learning generalizable perceptual representations of small molecules}, author={Sanchez-Lengeling, Benjamin and Wei, Jennifer N and Lee, Brian K and Gerkin, Richard C and Aspuru-Guzik, Al{\'a}n and Wiltschko, Alexander B}, journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10685}, year={2019} }</pre>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.354
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207