La relation entre recherche et action syndicale en éducation : le cas du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Après une brève mise en contexte de la situation syndicale en éducation au Québec, l’article traite de la création et du développement d’une équipe de recherche au sein de la Centrale des syndicats du Québec (CSQ) qui, à cette époque, en 1983, s’appelait Centrale de l’enseignement du Québec. Partant de la situation de crise syndicale et professionnelle qui a présidé à cette création, on décrit la manière dont a été conçue la programmation de recherche et ses rapports ultérieurs au processus politique interne de l’organisation. Par la suite, on aborde les principales thématiques développées au fil du temps, en identifiant leurs impacts politiques, tant à l’interne qu’à l’externe. La dernière section traite des transformations des relations entre la CSQ et le milieu de la recherche suite à la création de l’équipe de recherche, décrivant le passage d’une relation utilitaire à diverses formes d’institutionnalisation de cette relation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".