MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982228221 · doi:10.4095/223894

Paskapoo Groundwater Study Part III: detailed core measured sections of the Paskapoo Formation in central Alberta

2007· report· en· W2982228221 on OpenAlexaffabout
A P Hamblin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCore (optical fiber)GroundwaterGeologyArchaeologyGeographyComputer scienceGeotechnical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Paskapoo Formation, of Paleocene age, is an important, but poorly-understood groundwater aquifer in western Alberta, and is now emerging as a shallow gas reservoir. Because the Paskapoo represents the bedrock at surface over its area of occurrence, and has not previously been a major hydrocarbon target, there has been little study of outcrop or subsurface data. This report summarizes subsurface core work in central Alberta, primarily from wells located north and east of the cities of Calgary and Red Deer, where Paskapoo rocks form the bedrock surface unit. Most of the eight cores are positioned relatively close to the outcrop edge of the Paskapoo Formation, and so only include strata from the underlying Scollard, and the lower and middle portions of the Paskapoo. The latest two cores were cut during a recent joint project between Geological Survey of Canada and University of Calgary in 2003-2005. In this report, the information is presented as standard measured sections, with text descriptions of units. The lower Paskapoo is characterized by thick, multi-storied fluvial channel sandstones (Haynes Member) whereas the middle Paskapoo comprises primarily thinly interbedded siltstones and sandstones (Lacombe Member). This report is meant to be complementary to two other Open Files on the outcrop measured sections of the Paskapoo of the Red Deer region (GSC OF 5535), and of the Calgary region (GSC OF 5536).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207