Microstructure and blowing agent concentration analysis in accelerated aged polyurethane & polyisocyanurate insulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Some closed cell foam insulation products show an increase in thermal conductivity at low temperatures. This reduction in thermal performance has been attributed to the diffusion of air and blowing agent through the foam and to the condensation of the blowing agent. Aging processes and polymer degradation further increase the thermal conductivity of foams. The initial cell structure plays a role in dictating the thermal performance and changes with foam aging which is rarely investigated. To understand the loss of thermal performance in closed cell foams, a microstructure and chemical characterization of pristine and aged samples was performed in this study. The aging behaviour was analyzed by SEM imaging and by measuring the blowing agent concentration in the foam. Changes in the polymer physical attributes were identified. This study also used gas chromatography and quantified changes in pentane concentration in aged polyisocyanurate foams. Results show that aged foams undergo change in their polymer appearance and cellular elongation. Gas chromatography quantified a decrease in blowing agent in the range of 11-85% for polyisocyanurate foams after aging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".