MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982239923 · doi:10.4095/292167

Formal definition of the Neoproterozoic Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup (Northwest Territories), and formal stratigraphic nomenclature for its carbonate and evaporite formations

2012· report· en· W2982239923 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth C. Turner, Darrel G.F. Long

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvaporiteSupergroupGeologyCarbonatePaleontologyNomenclatureFormal descriptionCarbonate rockGeochemistrySedimentary rockChemistryTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup in NWT is formalised in this and a companion paper. The supergroup includes carbonate rocks of the Tabasco Formation (new), mudstones, sandstones and minor carbonate rocks of the Tsezotene Formation, sandstones, mudstones and carbonate rocks of the Katherine Group, and carbonate rocks, evaporite rocks and mudstones of the Little Dal Group. Descriptions and type sections are provided for eight new formations: the Tabasco Formation (formerly "H1 unit") and seven formations of the Little Dal Group (Dodo Creek, Stone Knife, Silverberry, Gayna, Ten Stone, Snail Spring, and Ram Head formations).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207