MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982262181 · doi:10.4095/291336

Provenance identification of detrital quartz using hot-cathode cathodoluminescence: an atlas of source rocks

2012· report· en· W2982262181 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cynthia Sawatzky, Georgia Pe‐Piper

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProvenanceCathodoluminescenceGeologyAtlas (anatomy)QuartzMineralogyGeochemistryIdentification (biology)PaleontologyMaterials scienceOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study forms part of a joint project between the Geological Survey of Canada and Saint Mary's University to investigate the provenance and diagenesis of reservoir sandstones in the offshore Scotian Basin. This report documents the optical and hot-cathode cathodoluminescence (CL) character of quartz from a suite of crystalline rocks. Most of these rocks are from potential bedrock sources to the Scotian Basin; a few archived rock samples from elsewhere were selected to characterize particular types of quartz without the expense of collecting samples in the field from throughout Atlantic Canada. A subsequent publication will apply the optical and CL properties documented here to sandstones in the Scotian Basin. The Atlas proper summarizes the CL colours and petrographic characteristics from each of six groups of source rocks, and then presents key data from each of the rocks examined in that group. The Appendix provides additional information on each rock sample. The six groups of quartz types based on source rocks are: Plutonic and hypabyssal intrusions Volcanic rocks Aplites and quartz vein Low grade metamorphic rocks Medium and high-grade metamorphic rocks High-pressure metamorphic rocks

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207