MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982270266 · doi:10.5539/jedp.v9n2p172

Investigation and Analysis of Vocational Training and Professional Identity of Biology Teachers in Southern Henan

2019· article· en· W2982270266 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bo Peng, XU Xiao-jie, Nongyi Zheng, Feng Peng, Xue-Zhong Sun, Xiayu Tian, Lulu He, Zhuanqing Yang, Rui-Hua Pang, Jintao Li, Quanxiu Wang, Wei Zhou, Hongyu Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Educational and Developmental Psychology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNanhu Scholars Program for Young Scholars of Xinyang Normal UniversityXinyang Normal University
KeywordsVocational educationProfessional developmentTraining (meteorology)Identity (music)PsychologyOrder (exchange)Medical educationPedagogyMathematics educationGeographyMedicineBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to effectively investigate the current professional status of biology special post teachers in the southern of Henan Province (Southern Henan), this study used the method of interviews and questionnaires to investigate and analyze the current situation of biology special post teachers in Southern Henan from the aspects of vocational training and professional identity. The results showed that: (1) Satisfaction with vocational training is still acceptable, all of them can participate in certain training, but the training policy and system need to be improved, the level of training is limited, the training opportunities are not balanced, and the training time and content need to be optimized. (2) Career identity is generally satisfactory, proud, respected and enthusiastic in teaching. It can promote the growth and development of students, but the suggestions of special post teachers have not been adopted in time. In view of the above findings, this paper puts forward some countermeasures for the professional development of biology special post teachers in Southern Henan, in order to provide theoretical basis for the follow-up study on the professional aspects of biology special post teachers, and also provide important information for the professional development of rural special post teachers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Educational and Developmental PsychologySame topicHigher Education and Teaching MethodsFrench-language works237,207