MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982280042 · doi:10.5220/0011277700003274

Attention for Inference Compilation

2022· preprint· en· W2982280042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInferenceComputer scienceProbabilistic logicLatent variableArtificial intelligenceRange (aeronautics)Machine learningSalientArtificial neural networkTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a neural network architecture for automatic amortized inference in universal probabilistic programs which improves on the performance of current architectures. Our approach extends inference compilation (IC), a technique which uses deep neural networks to approximate a posterior distribution over latent variables in a probabilistic program. A challenge with existing IC network architectures is that they can fail to capture long-range dependencies between latent variables. To address this, we introduce an attention mechanism that attends to the most salient variables previously sampled in the execution of a probabilistic program. We demonstrate that the addition of attention allows the proposal distributions to better match the true posterior, enhancing inference about latent variables in simulators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207