Statistical BER Analysis of Wireline Links With Non-Binary Linear Block Codes Subject to DFE Error Propagation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a statistical model to accurately estimate post-FEC BER for high-speed wireline links using standard linear block codes, such as the RS(544,514,15) KP4 and RS(528,514,7) KR4 codes. A hierarchical approach is adopted to analyze the propagation of PAM-symbol and FEC-symbol errors through a two-layer Markov model. A series of techniques including state aggregation, time aggregation, state reduction, and dynamic programming are introduced making the time complexity to compute post-FEC BER below 10-15reasonable. Error bounds associated with each method are found. The efficiency of the proposed model allows it to handle a larger state space, more DFE taps, and more sophisticated linear block codes than prior work. A 4-PAM 60 Gb/s wireline transceiver fabricated in a 7 nm FinFET technology is used as a test vehicle to validate this model. Measured data with two different channels reveals that the statistical model can properly predict the post-FEC error floor with standard FEC codes. While this paper demonstrates the method for capturing DFE error propagation, the method is general and can be applied to model other communication systems having memory effects. Moreover, our proposed model can be easily extended to higher-level PAM schemes and other advanced equalizer architectures to assist in making architectural choices for wireline transceivers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".