MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982289864 · doi:10.1109/pgsret.2019.8882723

An Innovization-based Model to Approximate Geometric Parameters of Solar Chimney Power Plant for Desired Efficiency and Output Power

2019· article· en· W2982289864 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolar Energy Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar chimneyPower (physics)Power stationRenewable energyChimney (locomotive)Electricity generationEfficient energy useElectrical efficiencyMathematical optimizationSolar powerComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar Chimney Power Plant (SCPP) is a sustainable source of power production. A SCCP is a renewable-energy power plant that transforms solar energy into electricity using a high chimney, surrounded by a large collector roof. Two main components of the SCPP are chimney and collector which their geometric parameters, consisting height and radius, play a significant rule in the amount of efficiency and output power of the SCCP. In this paper, a method is proposed to get the best values of such parameters to design a SCPP based on desired amount of efficiency and output power using evolutionary-based meta-modeling, optimization, and innovization techniques. In fact, while multi-objective optimization gives only a limited number of solutions which the designer has to select one of them with specific values of efficiency and output power, innovization on optimization results provides the possibility to approximate geometric parameters of SCPP for a desired amount of efficiency and output power without re-running the optimization process many times. The proposed model consists of three phases: 1) using simulation data, a mathematical model is obtained to get the values of efficiency and power based on the geometric characteristics, 2) a multi-objective optimization is conducted to maximize both objectives, efficiency and output power, 3) using innovization on optimized solutions, mathematical models are obtained to get values of geometric parameters based on desired efficiency and power values. Several experiments are conducted to get the results for each phase. Based on comparing the predicted efficiency and power with desired ones, the results are promising with a low level of error values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar Energy Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207