MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982292739 · doi:10.1093/synbio/ysz026

Rapid generation of sequence-diverse terminator libraries and their parameterization using quantitative Term-Seq

2019· article· en· W2982292739 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew J. Hudson, Hans‐Joachim Wieden

Bibliographic record

VenueSynthetic Biology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsTerm (time)Computer scienceTerminator (solar)Sequence (biology)Artificial intelligenceComputational biologyAlgorithmBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Synthetic biology and the rational design and construction of biological devices require vast numbers of characterized biological parts, as well as reliable design tools to build increasingly complex, multigene architectures. Design principles for intrinsic terminators have been established; however, additional sequence-structure studies are needed to refine parameters for termination-based genetic devices. We report a rapid single-pot method to generate libraries of thousands of randomized bidirectional intrinsic terminators and a modified quantitative Term-Seq (qTerm-Seq) method to simultaneously identify terminator sequences and measure their termination efficiencies (TEs). Using qTerm-Seq, we characterize hundreds of additional strong terminators (TE > 90%) with some terminators reducing transcription read-through by up to 1000-fold in Escherichia coli. Our terminator library and qTerm-Seq pipeline constitute a flexible platform enabling identification of terminator parts that can achieve transcription termination not only over a desired range but also to investigate their sequence-structure features, including for specific genetic and application contexts beyond the common in vivo systems such as E. coli.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynthetic BiologySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207