TVDR: A Novel Traffic Volume Aware Data Routing Protocol for Vehicular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, the evolution of both wireless communication technologies and vehicular technology have greatly promoted the development of Vehicular Networks (VNs). The VN allows for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications using wireless local area network technologies. The distinctive features of their candidate applications (e.g., collision warning and local traffic information for drivers), resources (e.g., computational sources), and their ability to collect various data from their environment (e.g., vehicular traffic flow patterns) make VNs a rich resource for information and resources. However, due to the transient nature of the network topology, data dissemination/content delivery is a challenging task in the VNs. Accordingly, in this article, we investigate the data dissemination/content delivery problem in VNs, and provide a novel traffic volume-aware data routing (TVDR) protocol for VNs. More precisely, by exploring the advantages of the various densities of coexistence vehicular traffic flows, the presented TVDR protocol can derive the data forwarding path with maximum link connection probability for the on-road vehicle. We evaluate the performance of the proposed TVDR protocol by conducting intensive simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".