MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982307121 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2019.8885457

Joint ML Time and Frequency Synchronization for Distributed MIMO-Relay Beamforming

2019· article· en· W2982307121 on OpenAlexaff
Souheib Ben Amor, Sofiène Affes, Faouzi Bellili, Usa Vilaipornsawai, Liqing Zhang, Peiying Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of TorontoInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingComputer scienceRelayMIMOSynchronization (alternating current)Node (physics)Carrier frequency offsetInitializationChannel (broadcasting)Frequency offsetElectronic engineeringComputer networkOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingTelecommunicationsEngineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate maximum likelihood (ML) time delay (TD) and carrier frequency offset (CFO) synchronization in multi-node decode-and-forward (DF) cooperative relaying systems operating over time-varying channels (TVCs). This new synchronization scheme is embedded into a distributed multiple input multiple output (MIMO)-relay beamforming transceiver structure to avoid the drawbacks of multidimensional ML estimation at the destination and to minimize the overhead cost. The new technique can be jointly implemented with any Doppler spread estimator in an iterative scheme using a time-constant channel (TCC) based synchronization method at the initialization step. The resulting TD and CFO estimates along with the channel estimates are then fed into a distributed MIMO-relay beamforming transceiver of K single-antenna nodes, for pre-compensation at each node of the transmitted signals, to ensure constructive maximum ratio combining (MRC) at the destination. Simulation results show significant synchronization accuracy improvement over previous distributed multi-node synchronization techniques assuming TCCs. The latter translates into noticeable gains in terms of useful link-level throughput, more so at higher Doppler or with more relaying nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207