Leaky-Wave Antenna Featuring Stable Radiation Based on Multimode Resonator (MMR) Concept
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, a scheme based on the multimode resonator (MMR) concept is proposed and demonstrated for the design and development of leaky-wave antennas (LWAs) to realize stable radiation properties (e.g., stable radiation efficiency and gain). Firstly, two kinds of traditional LWA unit cells possessing typical single-mode resonator and monotonic changing radiation behaviors are theoretically modeled and analyzed. The condition for LWAs featuring stable radiation properties is then derived, based on which the MMR concept is proposed as a solution for radiation stability. For demonstration purposes, two types of MMR-based unit cells and their associated 1-D periodic LWAs are studied and developed for millimeter-wave applications. One type is based on the magnetoelectric dipole, while the other originates from the aperture-coupled patch antenna. To facilitate the implementation, a detailed design procedure for this class of LWAs is provided in a general manner. The proposed two MMR-based periodic LWAs are modeled, fabricated, and measured. The simulated and measured results are in a reasonable agreement and both illustrate the stability of radiation efficiency and gain performances, thereby demonstrating the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed MMR design concept.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".