MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982350908

A Low Cost Automated Accident Notification System: Design, Simulation and Experimental Results

2018· article· en· W2982350908 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hetang Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire Detection and Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAccident (philosophy)Computer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last decades have seen the appearance and development of new embedded systems and IoT devices to improve car safety, such as auto brake, lane alignment, airbag, collision warning to name a few. However, despite the availability of new safety focused features, we still cannot put a break on increase in the number of car crash resulting in deaths. One of the main reasons for high death rate is late medical response to crash site or insufficient treatment of victims due to lack of knowledge of victim’s condition at the time of response. 
\nNational statistics clearly show that despite a growing wireless communication network and the availability of medical transport, the time to notify emergency personnel of a crash and respond to the crash victims can be quite lengthy. For fatal crashes in Canada, the average pre-hospital time is approximately 20 minutes in urban areas and 45 min to one hour in rural areas. 
\nIn this project, a new system was designed to notify the crash to health agencies and families via email, which is based on concepts of embedded system and IoT. There are several existing systems which also give the same results but the biggest asset of the proposed system is its ability for quick response with detail of seriousness of crash and image of the condition of victims in the car. Other features which similar system lack is the ability to communicate with each other. When we have lack of Internet due to no network on the phone or any other reason, systems of the crashed car will communicate with other systems in passing cars to relay the notification. In the project, two different kits were developed to work as two systems to test their performance and their ability to communicate with each other. The new system uses the hotspot feature of smartphone to provide Internet connection to send email when a crash occurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Same topicFire Detection and Safety SystemsFrench-language works237,207