MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982373015 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2019.8885047

On Sensitivity of Bias Operation Point In Transistors with Moderate Inversion

2019· article· en· W2982373015 on OpenAlexaff
I.M. Filanovsky, Luís B. Oliveira

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreshold voltageInversion (geology)VoltageAmplifierTransistorSensitivity (control systems)BiasingElectronic circuitComputer scienceOverdrive voltageElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper analyses sensitivity, with respect to the threshold voltage, of bias operation point in the analog circuits using moderate inversion. It is shown that this regime is highly sensitive with respect to the threshold voltage variation. Such high sensitivity imposes unrealistic requirements on the threshold voltage tolerances, so that it is practically impossible to design an amplifier with moderate inversion in the stages without adaptable or tunable threshold voltage. It is also shown that, as a result of this mode of inversion, some important design metrics (cancelling of the third order distortion) are unrealizable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207