Understanding the Role of SnO<sub>2</sub> Support in Water‐Tolerant Methane Combustion: <i>In situ</i> Observation of Pd(OH)<sub>2</sub> and Comparison with Pd/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Quantitative analysis of poisonous Pd hydroxide phase formation during methane combustion in the presence of water is performed via in situ X‐ray absorption spectroscopy from 200 to 500 deg C for palladium catalysts supported on tin and aluminum oxides. Water presence inhibits oxidation of the metallic Pd; for the Pd/Al2O3 catalyst the major oxidation product is Pd(OH)2, with PdO being the dominant phase on the Pd/SnO2 system. Tin dioxide is reduced during methane oxidation in the presence of water, regardless of the excess oxygen in the feed. Temperature‐programmed surface reactions at anaerobic and low‐oxygen conditions revealed that the Pd/SnO2 catalyst has an inability to catalyze methane steam reforming, as opposed to Pd/Al2O3. We suggest that tin oxide extracts hydroxyls from the PdO surface, which makes the latter more active in methane combustion in the presence of water but inactive in methane steam reforming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".